Skip to content
Explore the latest in technology, digital marketing, and in…

Could Different Countries Follow Australia's in Restricting Social Platforms for Youth Under Sixteen?

Australia's bold action to ban social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward parallel bans.

  • Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "robbing our children's innocence". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
  • Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
  • In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
  • The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust evidence".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful social media material argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

  • The state of Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
  • Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a regulation restricting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain figures to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, further nations are likewise exploring options.

  • Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global organizations take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

As this global conversation continues, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.

The writer

Sally Frederick

A seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience in international reporting, specializing in European and Middle Eastern affairs.

Notepulse UK

Type to search articles.